首页> 外文OA文献 >Dispute resolution outside of courts: Procedural justice and decision acceptance among users of ombuds services in the UK
【2h】

Dispute resolution outside of courts: Procedural justice and decision acceptance among users of ombuds services in the UK

机译:法院外的纠纷解决:英国申诉专员服务使用者的程序正义和判决接受

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Attitudes towards legal authorities based on theories of procedural justice have been explored extensively in the criminal and civil justice systems. This has provided considerable empirical evidence concerning the importance of trust and legitimacy in generating cooperation, compliance and decision acceptance. However, not enough attention has been paid to attitudes towards institutions of informal dispute resolution. This paper asks whether the theory of procedural justice applies to the alternative dispute resolution (ADR) context, focusing on ombuds services. What are the predictors of perceptions of procedural justice during the process of dealing with an ombuds, and what factors shape outcome acceptance? These questions are analyzed using a sample of recent ombuds users. The results indicate that outcome favorability is highly correlated with perceived procedural justice, and both predict decision acceptance.
机译:在刑事和民事司法系统中,已经广泛探索了基于程序正义理论对法律权威的态度。这提供了有关信任和合法性在产生合作,合规性和决定接受性方面的重要性的大量经验证据。但是,人们对非正式争端解决机构的态度没有得到足够的重视。本文询问程序正义理论是否适用于替代纠纷解决(ADR)上下文,重点是监察服务。在处理监察员的过程中,对程序正义的看法有哪些预测因素?哪些因素会影响结果接受?使用最近的ombuds用户样本分析了这些问题。结果表明,结果的可取性与感知的程序公正性高度相关,并且两者都可以预测决策的接受程度。

著录项

  • 作者

    Creutzfeldt, N; Bradford, B;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号